United States v. Robert Lipscomb, and Kanawha Economic Development Corporation

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Robert Lipscomb, and Kanawha Economic Development Corporation

14 F.3d 597, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4984, 1994 WL 1275

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 4, 1994

Docket92-1419

StatusPublished

This text of 14 F.3d 597 (United States v. Robert Lipscomb, and Kanawha Economic Development Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Robert Lipscomb, and Kanawha Economic Development Corporation, 14 F.3d 597, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4984, 1994 WL 1275 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

14 F.3d 597
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert LIPSCOMB, Defendant-Appellant,
and
KANAWHA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant.

No. 92-1419.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submited Oct. 12, 1993.
Jan. 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston; John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge.

Robert Lipscomb, appellant pro se.

Carol A. Casto, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, WV, for appellee.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Appellee's motion for summary judgment. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lipscomb, No. CA-90-154-2 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

14 F.3d 597
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert LIPSCOMB, Defendant-Appellant,
and
KANAWHA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant.

No. 92-1419.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submited Oct. 12, 1993.
Jan. 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston; John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge.

Robert Lipscomb, appellant pro se.

Carol A. Casto, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, WV, for appellee.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Appellee's motion for summary judgment. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lipscomb, No. CA-90-154-2 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 F.3d 597, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4984, 1994 WL 1275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-lipscomb-and-kanawha-econom-ca4-1994.