United States v. Robert Levon Hayes, Jack Graham Prentiss and Harry Ronald Lewis

439 F.2d 1127
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 22, 1971
Docket29826
StatusPublished

This text of 439 F.2d 1127 (United States v. Robert Levon Hayes, Jack Graham Prentiss and Harry Ronald Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robert Levon Hayes, Jack Graham Prentiss and Harry Ronald Lewis, 439 F.2d 1127 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1

1

. The assignments of error of appellant Lewis are as follows:

a. Allowance of accomplice testimony.
b. Improper admission and use of a statement by virtue of its having been made when appellant was mentally incompetent to make the statement.
c. Denial of appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal.
d. Error in the charge to the jury (unstated) .
The assignments of error of appellant Hayes are as follows:
a. Improper impeachment of appellant with testimony from a former trial where appellant was not on trial.
b. Denial of appellant’s motion for severance.
c. Improper use by the government of the statement of a co-defendant.
d. Erroneous charge by the court on accomplice testimony.
The assignments of error of appellant Prentiss are as follows:
a. Erroneous charge by the court on accomplice testimony.
b. Improper use by the government of the statement of a co-defendant.
c. Denial of appellant’s motion for severance.
d. Denial of the right of confrontation by virtue of the refusal of the court to permit evidence on the mental condition of appellant Lewis.
e. Denial of a motion for continuance.
f. Allowance of testimony of an accomplice.
g. Erroneous charge by the court on reasonable doubt and the duty of the jury.
h. Improper suggestion to the jury by the court as to what sentence a co-defendant might receive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
439 F.2d 1127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-levon-hayes-jack-graham-prentiss-and-harry-ronald-ca5-1971.