United States v. Robert Leonard Morton

38 F.3d 1214, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36661, 1994 WL 560775
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 14, 1994
Docket93-6926
StatusPublished

This text of 38 F.3d 1214 (United States v. Robert Leonard Morton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robert Leonard Morton, 38 F.3d 1214, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36661, 1994 WL 560775 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

38 F.3d 1214
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Robert Leonard MORTON, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6926.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 12, 1994
Decided: October 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, District Judge. (CR-90-234, CA-93-215)

Robert Leonard Morton, Appellant Pro Se.

Hunter P. Smith, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Morton, Nos. CR-90-234; CA-93-215 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 20, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 F.3d 1214, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36661, 1994 WL 560775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-leonard-morton-ca4-1994.