United States v. Robert Lee Weaselhead, Jr.

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Robert Lee Weaselhead, Jr.

165 F.3d 1209, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1167, 1999 WL 49096

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 29, 1999

Docket97-4397

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 165 F.3d 1209 (United States v. Robert Lee Weaselhead, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Robert Lee Weaselhead, Jr., 165 F.3d 1209, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1167, 1999 WL 49096 (8th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Chief Judge Bowman, Judge Richard S. Arnold, Judge Fagg, Judge Morris S. Arnold, and Judge Murphy would affirm the order of the district court rejecting Weaselhead’s claim of double jeopardy and denying his motion to dismiss Count III of the superseding indictment. Judge McMillian, Judge Wollman, Judge Beam, Judge Loken, and Judge Hansen would reverse that order.

By the vote of an equally divided Court, the order of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Chief Judge Bowman, Judge Richard S. Arnold, Judge Fagg, Judge Morris S. Arnold, and Judge Murphy would affirm the order of the district court rejecting Weaselhead’s claim of double jeopardy and denying his motion to dismiss Count III of the superseding indictment. Judge McMillian, Judge Wollman, Judge Beam, Judge Loken, and Judge Hansen would reverse that order.

By the vote of an equally divided Court, the order of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 F.3d 1209, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1167, 1999 WL 49096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-lee-weaselhead-jr-ca8-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack