United States v. Robert Lee Furr
This text of 405 F.2d 501 (United States v. Robert Lee Furr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
405 F.2d 501
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Robert Lee FURR, Appellant.
No. 11935.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Submitted February 3, 1969.
Decided February 18, 1969.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; Roszel C. Thomsen, Judge.
Stanley S. Cohen, Baltimore, Md. (Court-appointed counsel), on brief, for appellant.
Stephen H. Sachs, U. S. Atty., and Arthur G. Murphy, First Asst. U. S. Atty. on brief, for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Upon careful consideration, we find no error in the conviction.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
405 F.2d 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-lee-furr-ca4-1969.