United States v. Robert Lee Clay

408 F.2d 1028, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12848
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 11, 1969
Docket11681_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 408 F.2d 1028 (United States v. Robert Lee Clay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robert Lee Clay, 408 F.2d 1028, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12848 (4th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this prosecution for the interstate transportation of a falsely made security, it was proven that the defendant moved into the area where the check was. negotiated a few weeks before the transaction and contemporaneously adopted the name he used in making the check. That fact, however, did not require the direction of a verdict of acquittal. Under all of the circumstances, the question whether the defendant adopted the name with the fraudulent intent of negotiating worthless checks was for the jury. See United States v. Metcalf, 4 Cir., 388 F.2d 440 ; United States v. Ackerman, 7 Cir., 393 F.2d 121 ; Edge v. United States, 5 Cir., 270 F.2d 837 ; Hubsch v. United States, 5 Cir., 256 F.2d 820. See also Cunningham v. United States, 4 Cir., 272 F.2d 791 ; Jones v. United States, 4 Cir., 234 F.2d 812.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ketchum v. United States
327 F. Supp. 768 (D. Maryland, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
408 F.2d 1028, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-lee-clay-ca4-1969.