United States v. Robert L. Weaselhead
This text of United States v. Robert L. Weaselhead (United States v. Robert L. Weaselhead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 97-4397 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Robert Lee Weaselhead, Jr. * * [PUBLISHED] Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: January 11, 1999 Filed: January 29, 1999 ___________
Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, WOLLMAN, BEAM, LOKEN, HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, MURPHY, En Banc.
PER CURIAM.
Chief Judge Bowman, Judge Richard S. Arnold, Judge Fagg, Judge Morris S. Arnold, and Judge Murphy would affirm the order of the district court rejecting Weaselhead’s claim of double jeopardy and denying his motion to dismiss Count III of the superseding indictment. Judge McMillian, Judge Wollman, Judge Beam, Judge Loken, and Judge Hansen would reverse that order. By the vote of an equally divided Court, the order of the district court is affirmed.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Robert L. Weaselhead, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-l-weaselhead-ca8-1999.