United States v. Robert L. Hood

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Robert L. Hood

443 F.2d 380, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9544

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 16, 1971

Docket26431_1

StatusPublished

This text of 443 F.2d 380 (United States v. Robert L. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Robert L. Hood, 443 F.2d 380, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9544 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted by a jury and sentenced for possessing amphetamine tablets, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 331 *381 (q) (3), and selling those tablets, in violation of § 331 (q) (2). On appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to establish (1) that he possessed the tablets, (2) that he sold the tablets, and (3) that he was a member of a common scheme so that incriminating statements of confederates were admissible against him. We have reviewed the evidence and concluded that it was in all respects sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted by a jury and sentenced for possessing amphetamine tablets, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 331 *381 (q) (3), and selling those tablets, in violation of § 331 (q) (2). On appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to establish (1) that he possessed the tablets, (2) that he sold the tablets, and (3) that he was a member of a common scheme so that incriminating statements of confederates were admissible against him. We have reviewed the evidence and concluded that it was in all respects sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

443 F.2d 380, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-l-hood-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack