United States v. Robert L. Hood

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Robert L. Hood

443 F.2d 380, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9544

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 16, 1971·No. 26431_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted by a jury and sentenced for possessing amphetamine tablets, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 331 *381 (q) (3), and selling those tablets, in violation of § 331 (q) (2). On appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to establish (1) that he possessed the tablets, (2) that he sold the tablets, and (3) that he was a member of a common scheme so that incriminating statements of confederates were admissible against him. We have reviewed the evidence and concluded that it was in all respects sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted by a jury and sentenced for possessing amphetamine tablets, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 331 *381 (q) (3), and selling those tablets, in violation of § 331 (q) (2). On appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to establish (1) that he possessed the tablets, (2) that he sold the tablets, and (3) that he was a member of a common scheme so that incriminating statements of confederates were admissible against him. We have reviewed the evidence and concluded that it was in all respects sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed.

United States v. Robert L. Hood, 443 F.2d 380, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9544 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

443 F.2d 380 (United States v. Robert L. Hood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related