United States v. Robert Kenneth Lomas

723 F.2d 649, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26618
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 9, 1984·No. 81-1768·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In United States v. Lomas, 706 F.2d 886 (9th Cir.1983), we remanded for the district court to pursue several inquiries, including the question of whether the Government would have discovered the incriminating evidence had it not illegally seized the hotel room. The district court determined that the room would have been searched pursuant to a valid warrant even if it had not been locked by Agent Wilma, and that the warrant was not based in any way upon the illegal seizure. We also note that because Lomas was in custody on the evening of April 17, 1981, he would not have been able to return to the hotel and destroy the evidence, even had the room not been locked.

Lomas’ conviction is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Robert Kenneth Lomas, 723 F.2d 649, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26618 (9th Cir. 1984).

723 F.2d 649 (United States v. Robert Kenneth Lomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bolt
689 P.2d 519 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1984)