United States v. Robert Graff

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Robert Graff

451 F.2d 1389

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 7, 1972

Docket71-2346

StatusPublished

This text of 451 F.2d 1389 (United States v. Robert Graff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Robert Graff, 451 F.2d 1389 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction for possession of and for transferring an automatic rifle is affirmed.

In our view, the implications of United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 91 S. Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356 (1971) require affirmance.

While the record would seem to indicate that Graff is not vicious but a bumbler, our view is that the jury’s verdict was permissible.

True, it is a felony conviction, but it is apparent that if defendant is a good probationer, because of his youth, his conviction will disappear from the record under applicable law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction for possession of and for transferring an automatic rifle is affirmed.

In our view, the implications of United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 91 S. Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356 (1971) require affirmance.

While the record would seem to indicate that Graff is not vicious but a bumbler, our view is that the jury’s verdict was permissible.

True, it is a felony conviction, but it is apparent that if defendant is a good probationer, because of his youth, his conviction will disappear from the record under applicable law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

451 F.2d 1389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-graff-ca9-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack