United States v. Robert Goldberg

426 F.2d 285, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9362
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 7, 1970
Docket27013
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 426 F.2d 285 (United States v. Robert Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robert Goldberg, 426 F.2d 285, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9362 (5th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to our Rule 18 we decide this case on the record, the brief of appellant and a statement by the United States of its position that the conviction should be set aside.

Appellant was convicted under Count 2 of the indictment of acquiring marijuana without having paid the transfer tax required by 26 U.S.C. § 4741 (a), in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4744(a). The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is a good defense to such a charge. Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969); United States v. Scardino, 414 F.2d 925 (5th Cir. 1969). Since appellant’s conviction was not yet final at the *286 time Leary was decided, Leary commands reversal of the conviction under Count 2 of the indictment. Thompson v. United States, 421 F.2d 174 [5th Cir., 1970]; United States v. Scardino, supra.

As to Count 2 we reverse. Because we are unable to determine from the record what disposition was made of the other counts of the indictment, we remand to the District Court for such further action as may be appropriate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frederico Medina v. United States
427 F.2d 525 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
426 F.2d 285, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-goldberg-ca5-1970.