United States v. Robert Flanagan, James Keweshan, Sidney Landis and Thomas McNamee

Third Circuit

United States v. Robert Flanagan, James Keweshan, Sidney Landis and Thomas McNamee

730 F.2d 945, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23596

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 12, 1984

Docket81-3116

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 730 F.2d 945 (United States v. Robert Flanagan, James Keweshan, Sidney Landis and Thomas McNamee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Robert Flanagan, James Keweshan, Sidney Landis and Thomas McNamee, 730 F.2d 945, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23596 (3d Cir. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before GIBBONS and HUNTER, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge * .

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge:

When this appeal was first considered the governing precedents in this court established that orders disqualifying counsel were collaterally final. See e.g., United States v. Miller, 624 F.2d 1198, 1199 (3d Cir.1980); IBM v. Levin, 579 F.2d 271, 277-78 (3d Cir.1978). Those holdings were not affected by Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord, 449 U.S. 368, 372 n. 8, 101 S.Ct. 669, 672 n. 8, 66 L.Ed.2d 571 (1981). We affirmed the district court disqualification order 527 F.Supp. 902. United States v. Flanagan, 679 F.2d 1072 (3d Cir.1982). The defendants petitioned for certiorari. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and held that a District Court pretrial disqualification of defense counsel in a criminal prosecution is not immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The Court directed that this appeal be dismissed. Flanagan v. United States, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1051, 79 L.Ed.2d 288 (1984). In compliance with that direction the appeal will be dismissed.

*

Hon. Anne E. Thompson, United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before GIBBONS and HUNTER, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge * .

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge:

When this appeal was first considered the governing precedents in this court established that orders disqualifying counsel were collaterally final. See e.g., United States v. Miller, 624 F.2d 1198, 1199 (3d Cir.1980); IBM v. Levin, 579 F.2d 271, 277-78 (3d Cir.1978). Those holdings were not affected by Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord, 449 U.S. 368, 372 n. 8, 101 S.Ct. 669, 672 n. 8, 66 L.Ed.2d 571 (1981). We affirmed the district court disqualification order 527 F.Supp. 902. United States v. Flanagan, 679 F.2d 1072 (3d Cir.1982). The defendants petitioned for certiorari. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and held that a District Court pretrial disqualification of defense counsel in a criminal prosecution is not immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The Court directed that this appeal be dismissed. Flanagan v. United States, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1051, 79 L.Ed.2d 288 (1984). In compliance with that direction the appeal will be dismissed.

*

Hon. Anne E. Thompson, United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

730 F.2d 945, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-flanagan-james-keweshan-sidney-landis-and-thomas-ca3-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack