United States v. Robert Fall

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-7131

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT MICHAEL FALL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jamar Kentrell Walker, District Judge. (2:17-cr-00012-JKW-DEM-1)

Submitted: February 19, 2026 Decided: February 23, 2026

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Michael Fall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Michael Fall appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his Motion for Review of Special Conditions of Supervision. * We have reviewed the record and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Castellano, 60 F.4th 217, 224 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Fall, No. 2:17-cr-00012-JKW-DEM- 1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Fall has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel, as well as a motion to seal medical records submitted in support of the motion for counsel. We grant the motion to seal but deny the motion for appointment of counsel.