United States v. Robert Eberhart

420 F. App'x 654
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 8, 2011
Docket10-3392
StatusUnpublished

This text of 420 F. App'x 654 (United States v. Robert Eberhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robert Eberhart, 420 F. App'x 654 (8th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Eberhart pleaded guilty to three counts of distributing more than five grams of cocaine base in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court 1 imposed concurrent sentences of 57 months in prison and three years of supervised release. Eberhart appeals. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the district court abused its discretion in not imposing a more lenient sentence. Eberhart moves for appointment of new counsel.

Eberhart has not rebutted the presumption that his sentence at the bottom of the advisory guidelines range is not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir.2009) (en banc); United States v. Valadez, 573 F.3d 553, 556 (8th Cir.2009) (per curiam). Additionally, having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court affirmed. We deny Eberhart’s motion for new counsel and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, conditioned on counsel informing Eberhart about the procedures for seeking rehearing from this court and filing a petition for a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court of the United States.

1

. The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Valadez
573 F.3d 553 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Feemster
572 F.3d 455 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
420 F. App'x 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-eberhart-ca8-2011.