United States v. Robert Earl Saunders, A/K/A John Robert Sanders, Leonard Alfred Johnson

Third Circuit

United States v. Robert Earl Saunders, A/K/A John Robert Sanders, Leonard Alfred Johnson

442 F.2d 1335, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9557

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 15, 1971·No. 19210_1·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

John Robert Sanders appeals from a judgment of conviction of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) and (d). He was tried to a jury and represented by privately retained counsel.

On this appeal, Sanders asserts that he was denied his constitutional right to adequate legal representation as the result of the incompetence of the lawyer who represented him at trial.

We have carefully examined the record in this case and find no basis for appellant’s claim that he was not adequately represented.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

John Robert Sanders appeals from a judgment of conviction of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) and (d). He was tried to a jury and represented by privately retained counsel.

On this appeal, Sanders asserts that he was denied his constitutional right to adequate legal representation as the result of the incompetence of the lawyer who represented him at trial.

We have carefully examined the record in this case and find no basis for appellant’s claim that he was not adequately represented.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

United States v. Robert Earl Saunders, A/K/A John Robert Sanders, Leonard Alfred Johnson, 442 F.2d 1335, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9557 (3d Cir. 1971).

Pincite

442 F.2d 1335 (United States v. Robert Earl Saunders, A/K/A John Robert Sanders, Leonard Alfred Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related