United States v. Robert Earl Saunders, A/K/A John Robert Sanders, Leonard Alfred Johnson
This text of 442 F.2d 1335 (United States v. Robert Earl Saunders, A/K/A John Robert Sanders, Leonard Alfred Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
John Robert Sanders appeals from a judgment of conviction of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) and (d). He was tried to a jury and represented by privately retained counsel.
On this appeal, Sanders asserts that he was denied his constitutional right to adequate legal representation as the result of the incompetence of the lawyer who represented him at trial.
We have carefully examined the record in this case and find no basis for appellant’s claim that he was not adequately represented.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
442 F.2d 1335, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-earl-saunders-aka-john-robert-sanders-leonard-ca3-1971.