United States v. Robert E. Schoonover

Third Circuit

United States v. Robert E. Schoonover

360 F.2d 165, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6248

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 6, 1966·No. 15618·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant has been convicted under an indictment charging in several counts falsely uttering two separate checks, forging one check and mail fraud. On certain counts the appellant complains that the evidence did not justify conviction. Our independent examination of the record satisfies us that the evidence warranted a guilty verdict on each count. Other points concerning the court’s *166 charge and rulings on the admission of evidence have been considered, but we find no reversible error.

The judgment and sentence of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The appellant has been convicted under an indictment charging in several counts falsely uttering two separate checks, forging one check and mail fraud. On certain counts the appellant complains that the evidence did not justify conviction. Our independent examination of the record satisfies us that the evidence warranted a guilty verdict on each count. Other points concerning the court’s *166 charge and rulings on the admission of evidence have been considered, but we find no reversible error.

The judgment and sentence of the District Court will be affirmed.

United States v. Robert E. Schoonover, 360 F.2d 165, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6248 (3d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

360 F.2d 165 (United States v. Robert E. Schoonover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.