United States v. Robert E. Downs
This text of United States v. Robert E. Downs (United States v. Robert E. Downs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 01-2215 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Robert E. Downs, * Eastern District of Missouri. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] ___________
Submitted: November 7, 2001 Filed: November 15, 2001 ___________
Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Robert E. Downs pleaded guilty to making a false statement when purchasing a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), and being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court1 sentenced him to 33 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release. Downs argues on appeal, renewing the objection he presented below, that the court erroneously set his base offense level by characterizing as a crime of violence his prior Missouri conviction for statutory rape.
1 The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. We reject this argument as foreclosed by United States v. Bauer, 990 F.2d 373, 374-75 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam), and United States v. Rodriguez, 979 F.2d 138, 140-41 (8th Cir. 1992).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Robert E. Downs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-e-downs-ca8-2001.