United States v. Robert Dunlap

389 F. App'x 359
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 5, 2010
Docket10-50249
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 389 F. App'x 359 (United States v. Robert Dunlap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robert Dunlap, 389 F. App'x 359 (5th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Robert Lloyd Dunlap, federal prisoner # 56812-180, seeks leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the *360 district court’s denial of his motion to reduce sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Dunlap also moves for the appointment of counsel.

In order to obtain leave to proceed IFP, Dunlap must show that he is a pauper, and he must raise a nonfrivolous issue. See Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep’t, 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir.1986). Dunlap provides only his financial information and does not address whether his appeal will present a nonfrivolous issue. Dunlap does not even mention the denial of his § 3553(a) motion for lack of jurisdiction. Dunlap’s appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983).

Accordingly, Dunlap’s request for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED. His motion for appointment of counsel is also DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. City of Las Vegas
Fifth Circuit, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
389 F. App'x 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-dunlap-ca5-2010.