United States v. Robert Dasilva

953 F.2d 1388, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6717, 1992 WL 19825
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 1992
Docket90-50674
StatusUnpublished

This text of 953 F.2d 1388 (United States v. Robert Dasilva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robert Dasilva, 953 F.2d 1388, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6717, 1992 WL 19825 (9th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

953 F.2d 1388

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert DASILVA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-50674.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 9, 1992.*
Decided Feb. 7, 1992.

Before FARRIS, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In light of our opinion in United States v. Allen, No. 90-50666, submitted on January 8, 1992, Dasilva's conviction is AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir. Rule 34-4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hogle (John Craig)
953 F.2d 1388 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
953 F.2d 1388, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6717, 1992 WL 19825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-dasilva-ca9-1992.