United States v. Robert Cravens

415 F. App'x 746
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 13, 2011
Docket10-3768
StatusUnpublished

This text of 415 F. App'x 746 (United States v. Robert Cravens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robert Cravens, 415 F. App'x 746 (8th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Cravens pleaded guilty to two counts of unlawful possession of firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), and the district court 1 sentenced him to concurrent prison terms of 120 months and 216 months. Cravens appeals. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), questioning the determination that Cravens was an armed career criminal.

We find no error in the determination, and conclude that the district court properly sentenced Cravens. Portions of the presentence report (PSR) to which Cravens did not object showed that he had three previous convictions for a violent felony (one assault causing physical injury, and two burglaries), which subjected him to enhanced sentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). See Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 26, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005) (listing charging document among judicial records that court may consider in assessing predicate convictions for § 924(e)); United States v. Livingston, 442 F.3d 1082, 1084 (8th Cir.2006) (using PSR’s description of charging instrument to decide whether prior conviction was violent felony under § 924(e)).

Having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion, and we affirm the judgment.

1

. The Honorable Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Shepard v. United States
544 U.S. 13 (Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
415 F. App'x 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-cravens-ca8-2011.