United States v. Robert Collins

470 F. App'x 645
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 5, 2012
Docket10-16409
StatusUnpublished

This text of 470 F. App'x 645 (United States v. Robert Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robert Collins, 470 F. App'x 645 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Robert John Collins appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion seeking the disclosure of DNA test results under 42 U.S.C. § 14132(b)(3)(C), and new DNA testing *646 under 18 U.S.C. § 3600. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court ruled that there is no private right of action under section 14132 to obtain DNA evidence, and that Collins was not entitled to new DNA testing because he failed to meet the statutory requirements of section 3600. On appeal, Collins fails to argue that there is a private right of action under section 14132, or that he meets the requirements of section 3600. Instead, he raises new arguments to support his claim that he is entitled to the DNA evidence. Collins’ arguments do not fall within any of the exceptions to the general rule that an issue may not be raised for the first time on appeal. See Manta v. Chertoff, 518 F.3d 1134, 1144 (9th Cir.2008).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manta v. Chertoff
518 F.3d 1134 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
470 F. App'x 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-collins-ca9-2012.