United States v. Robert Carl Morgan
This text of 682 F.2d 167 (United States v. Robert Carl Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This matter comes before the Court pursuant to Robert Morgan’s appeal from a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence.
After a careful review of the records and brief, we affirm the district court. It is clear to us that Morgan’s plea of guilty was voluntary and that it was not based on a misunderstanding of the plea agreement which served as the basis for the plea. We *168 are moreover convinced that his sentence was not augmented by the court because it was incorrectly informed as to the quantities of cocaine involved in the transaction for which Morgan was convicted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
682 F.2d 167, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-carl-morgan-ca8-1982.