United States v. Robert Alvin Adkins

426 F.2d 298, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9001
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 28, 1970
Docket28804
StatusPublished

This text of 426 F.2d 298 (United States v. Robert Alvin Adkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robert Alvin Adkins, 426 F.2d 298, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9001 (5th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted of violating Title 50 App., U.S.C.A. § 462, possession of a selective service registration certificate (draft card), which had not been issued to him, with the intent that it be used for false identification. 1 The sole assignment of error is that certain inculpatory statements made by appellant to a special agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation were involun *299 tarily made. This question involves alleged coercion as well as a violation of the Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights due appellant under Miranda v. Arizona, 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.

The district court did not err in admitting the statements. The evidence as to claimed coercion is such as not to require a contrary ruling, and the Miranda claim is frivolous. There are no facts whatever to support appellant’s contention that his Miranda rights were violated.

Affirmed.

1

. We dispose of this ease on the briefs and record, without oral agument, as provided by our Local Rule 18.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
426 F.2d 298, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-alvin-adkins-ca5-1970.