United States v. Roberson, III
This text of 591 F.3d 1337 (United States v. Roberson, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dave Roberson, III, appeals his 300-month sentence for robbery of a commercial business, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Roberson asserts his prior Georgia conviction for a walkaway escape did not constitute a predicate “crime of violence” qualifying him for sentencing as a career offender under the Sentencing Guidelines. U.S.S.G. §§ 4Bl.l(a), 4B1.2(a).
The Government concedes that, in light of the recent decision in Chambers v. United States, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 687, 172 L.Ed.2d 484 (2009), “Roberson’s escape conviction, based upon a walkaway escape, did not constitute a crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2. We agree with the Government’s concession. Thus, we vacate and remand for resentencing.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
591 F.3d 1337, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 28771, 2009 WL 5125492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roberson-iii-ca11-2009.