United States v. Roberson, III

591 F.3d 1337, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 28771, 2009 WL 5125492
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 30, 2009·No. 09-10519·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dave Roberson, III, appeals his 300-month sentence for robbery of a commercial business, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Roberson asserts his prior Georgia conviction for a walkaway escape did not constitute a predicate “crime of violence” qualifying him for sentencing as a career offender under the Sentencing Guidelines. U.S.S.G. §§ 4Bl.l(a), 4B1.2(a).

The Government concedes that, in light of the recent decision in Chambers v. United States, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 687, 172 L.Ed.2d 484 (2009), “Roberson’s escape conviction, based upon a walkaway escape, did not constitute a crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2. We agree with the Government’s concession. Thus, we vacate and remand for resentencing.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Roberson, III, 591 F.3d 1337, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 28771, 2009 WL 5125492 (11th Cir. 2009).

591 F.3d 1337 (United States v. Roberson, III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chambers v. United States
555 U.S. 122 (Supreme Court, 2009)