United States v. Robbin Bradley Cook

39 F.3d 1189, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37867, 1994 WL 621178
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 1994
Docket93-50855
StatusUnpublished

This text of 39 F.3d 1189 (United States v. Robbin Bradley Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robbin Bradley Cook, 39 F.3d 1189, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37867, 1994 WL 621178 (9th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

39 F.3d 1189

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robbin Bradley COOK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-50855.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 1, 1994.*
Decided Nov. 8, 1994.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Robbin Bradley Cook appeals his conviction and 46-month sentence following his guilty plea to unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cook's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no arguable issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel of record is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Lomask (Sanford)
39 F.3d 1189 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 F.3d 1189, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37867, 1994 WL 621178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robbin-bradley-cook-ca9-1994.