United States v. Robaina

84 F. App'x 386
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 9, 2003
Docket03-50441
StatusUnpublished

This text of 84 F. App'x 386 (United States v. Robaina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robaina, 84 F. App'x 386 (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Jorge Robaina appeals his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 1000 or more kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. Robaina argues that his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary because the plea agreement promised that he would receive a sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines but the district court sentenced him to the statutory mandatory minimum sentence of ten years. Under U.S.S.G. § 5Gl.l(b), if the statutorily mandated sentence is greater than the maximum of the applicable guideline range, the statutorily required minimum sentence shall be the guideline sentence. See United States v. Fitch, 137 F.3d 277, 278 (5th Cir.1998). Robaina’s plea agreement was not broken because he was sentenced to the mandatory minimum sentence. See U.S.S.G. § 5Gl.l(b); Fitch, 137 F.3d at 278.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Fitch
137 F.3d 277 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 F. App'x 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robaina-ca5-2003.