United States v. Rivers
This text of 316 F. App'x 658 (United States v. Rivers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Delson Ray Rivers appeals from the 32-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Rivers contends that the district court erred by pre-determining his sentence and by imposing a sentence that punished him for the offenses underlying the revocation. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error and that the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc); see also United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1061-1064 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
316 F. App'x 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rivers-ca9-2009.