United States v. Rivera-Martinez
This text of 17 F. App'x 650 (United States v. Rivera-Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jose Rivera-Martinez appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1).
Rivera-Martinez’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Rivera-Martinez did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Having conducted an independent review of [651]*651the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 88-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no arguable appellate issues. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 F. App'x 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rivera-martinez-ca9-2001.