United States v. Rivera-Lazaro
This text of United States v. Rivera-Lazaro (United States v. Rivera-Lazaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41246 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NARCISCO PACO RIVERA-LAZARO,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-03-CR-119-1 --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Narcisco Paco Rivera-Lazaro
(Rivera) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rivera
has not responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of
counsel’s brief and supplemental brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rivera-Lazaro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rivera-lazaro-ca5-2004.