United States v. Rivera
This text of United States v. Rivera (United States v. Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50799 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM RAFAEL RIVERA,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:03-CR-564-7 --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent William Rafael Rivera on
appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rivera
has filed a response. Our independent review of the brief,
Rivera’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue
for appeal. The record is insufficiently developed to allow
consideration of Rivera’s claims of ineffective assistance of
counsel. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th
Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-50799 -2-
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rivera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rivera-ca5-2007.