United States v. Rivas

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Rivas

166 F.3d 747

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rivas. Read the opinion of the Court — 157 F.3d 364 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 1, 1999·No. 96-10302·Published

Opinion

*748 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion 10/2/98, 5 Cir., 157 F.3d 364)

PER CURIAM:

The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. In denying rehearing the panel emphasizes that we do not suggest that there are no circumstances under which force might be appropriate to effectuate a border search. These are fact intensive inquiries.

The court having been polled at the request of one of its members and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35, 5th Cir. R. 35) the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*748 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion 10/2/98, 5 Cir., 157 F.3d 364)

PER CURIAM:

The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. In denying rehearing the panel emphasizes that we do not suggest that there are no circumstances under which force might be appropriate to effectuate a border search. These are fact intensive inquiries.

The court having been polled at the request of one of its members and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35, 5th Cir. R. 35) the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

United States v. Rivas, 166 F.3d 747 (5th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

166 F.3d 747 (United States v. Rivas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related