United States v. Rivas
This text of 166 F.3d 747 (United States v. Rivas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*748 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion 10/2/98, 5 Cir., 157 F.3d 364)
The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. In denying rehearing the panel emphasizes that we do not suggest that there are no circumstances under which force might be appropriate to effectuate a border search. These are fact intensive inquiries.
The court having been polled at the request of one of its members and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35, 5th Cir. R. 35) the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 F.3d 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rivas-ca5-1999.