United States v. Rispoli

189 F. 271, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided June 14, 1911·No. No. 18·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The court overruled the defendant’s objection of privilege, and permitted the witness to be examined, on the ground that the offense charged was against the wife’s person as really as if the defendant were charged with threatening to inflict physical violence, or of having actually struck her. In cases where the wife’s personal rights were concerned, the exceptions to the husband’s privilege should be benevolently regarded, and the offense in question was essentially within the spirit of the long-established rule that allows her to testify in protection or in vindication of her right to be secure in her person against threat or assault, even by her husband.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rispoli, 189 F. 271, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192 (E.D. Pa. 1911).

189 F. 271 (United States v. Rispoli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James Ivey Wyatt v. United States
263 F.2d 304 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)
Alford v. Territory of Hawaii
205 F.2d 616 (Ninth Circuit, 1953)
Territory v. Alford
39 Haw. 460 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1952)
Shores v. United States
174 F.2d 838 (Eighth Circuit, 1949)
United States v. Williams
55 F. Supp. 375 (D. Minnesota, 1944)
United States v. Mitchell
137 F.2d 1006 (Second Circuit, 1943)
Denning v. United States
247 F. 463 (Fifth Circuit, 1918)
Pappas v. United States
241 F. 665 (Ninth Circuit, 1917)
United States v. Bozeman
236 F. 432 (W.D. Washington, 1916)
United States v. Kukilani
4 D. Haw. 696 (D. Hawaii, 1916)
Cohen v. United States
214 F. 23 (Ninth Circuit, 1914)
United States v. Gwynne
209 F. 993 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1914)