United States v. Rios-Mendoza
This text of United States v. Rios-Mendoza (United States v. Rios-Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-41152 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FELIPE RIOS-MENDOZA,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-00-CR-528-1 -------------------- April 10, 2001
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Felipe Rios-Mendoza appeals his guilty-plea conviction for
illegal reentry following deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326. Rios-Mendoza argues that 1) his 1998 removal was simply
a reinstatement of his 1967 deportation, thereby relieving Rios-
Mendoza of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2)’s penalty enhancement, and
2) the superseding indictment against Rios-Mendoza was defective
because it failed to allege general intent. Rios-Mendoza’s
claims are foreclosed by this court’s precedent. See United
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-41152 -2-
States v. Nava-Perez, 242 F.3d 277, 279 (5th Cir. 2001); United
States v. Guzman-Ocampo, 236 F.3d 233, 237 (5th Cir. 2000).
Accordingly, Rios-Mendoza’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rios-Mendoza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rios-mendoza-ca5-2001.