United States v. Rios

135 F. App'x 756
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2005·No. 04-40351·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Macsimiano Rios (“Rios”) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for aiding and abetting in the possession with intent to distribute nine kilograms of cocaine. He argues that 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and (b) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Rios raises an issue that he concedes is foreclosed but seeks to preserve for further review.

This argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir.2000). Accordingly, Rios’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rios, 135 F. App'x 756 (5th Cir. 2005).

135 F. App'x 756 (United States v. Rios) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Slaughter
238 F.3d 580 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)