United States v. Rios
76 M.J. 66, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 32
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 18, 2017
DocketNo. 17-0110/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 76 M.J. 66 (United States v. Rios) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Rios, 76 M.J. 66, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 32 (Ark. 2017).
Opinion
CCA 20140971. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues:
I. WHETHER ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT AS A CMCR JUDGE TERMINATED THE MILITARY COMMISSION OF JUDGE HERRING.
II. WHETHER, AS AN APPOINTED JUDGE OF THE CMCR,- JUDGE HERRING DID NOT MEET THE UCMJ DEFINITION OF AN APPELLATE MILITARY JUDGE.
III.WHETHER THE ASSIGNMENT OF INFERIOR OFFICERS ÁND PRINCIPAL OFFICERS TO A SINGLE JUDICIAL TRIBUNAL ITSELF VIOLATED THE APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE.
[67]*67No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 66, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rios-armfor-2017.