United States v. Riley L. Parnell, United States of America v. J. H. Reed, Jr.
This text of 272 F.2d 943 (United States v. Riley L. Parnell, United States of America v. J. H. Reed, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
272 F.2d 943
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Riley L. PARNELL et al., Appellees.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
J. H. REED, Jr., et al., Appellees.
No. 13831.
No. 13832.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
December 17, 1959.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville; William E. Miller, Judge.
Charles K. Rice, Leo M. McCormack, Lee A. Jackson and John J. Pajak, Washington, D. C., Fred Elledge, Jr., U. S. Atty., Nashville, Tenn., for appellant.
William Waller, Sr., Waller, Davis & Lansden, Nashville, Tenn., for appellees.
Before MARTIN and WEICK, Circuit Judges, and BROOKS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal of the United States from the judgment of these consolidated tax cases has been duly heard and considered upon the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys and upon the record in the cause, including the opinion of the District Court:
And it appearing that the findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence and that the conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous but correctly drawn by Judge William E. Miller;
The judgment of the United States District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 F.2d 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-riley-l-parnell-united-states-of-a-ca6-1959.