United States v. Riley

District of Columbia

United States v. Riley

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedSeptember 11, 2009

DocketCriminal No. 2009-0144

StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Riley (United States v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Riley, (D.D.C. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT D

FoR THE DISTRICT oF CQLUMBIA SEp 1 1 2009 ) NANcY MAYEa wrurrmeron, cLERK UNITED STATES oF AMERICA, ) U-S-D'S“"°T°°““T ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 09-cr-144 (ESH) ) CYPRIAN R. RILEY, ) ) Defendant. ) g

ORDER

ln a hearing before Magistrate Judge Kay on August 3 l, 2009, defendant Cyprian R. Riley entered a plea of guilty. On that date, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Rec0mmendation advising the Court to accept defendant’s plea. The Court has received no objection to the Report and Recommendation. See Local Crim. R. 57.l9(b) ("Any party may file written objections to the magistrate judge’s proposed findings and recommendations . . . within ten days after being served with a copy there0f."). Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the recommendation of the magistrate judge and accepts defendant Riley’s guilty plea.

SO ORDERED.

C(/Cu d //u

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge

Date: September ll, 2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT D

FoR THE DISTRICT oF CQLUMBIA SEp 1 1 2009 ) NANcY MAYEa wrurrmeron, cLERK UNITED STATES oF AMERICA, ) U-S-D'S“"°T°°““T ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 09-cr-144 (ESH) ) CYPRIAN R. RILEY, ) ) Defendant. ) g

ORDER

ln a hearing before Magistrate Judge Kay on August 3 l, 2009, defendant Cyprian R. Riley entered a plea of guilty. On that date, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Rec0mmendation advising the Court to accept defendant’s plea. The Court has received no objection to the Report and Recommendation. See Local Crim. R. 57.l9(b) ("Any party may file written objections to the magistrate judge’s proposed findings and recommendations . . . within ten days after being served with a copy there0f."). Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the recommendation of the magistrate judge and accepts defendant Riley’s guilty plea.

SO ORDERED.

C(/Cu d //u

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge

Date: September ll, 2009

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

United States v. Riley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-riley-dcd-2009.