United States v. Riley

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Riley

42 F. App'x 596

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 31, 2002·No. 02-4136·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court’s order forfeiting substitute assets and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Riley, No. CR-98-101 (E.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2002; Feb. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *597 the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court’s order forfeiting substitute assets and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Riley, No. CR-98-101 (E.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2002; Feb. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *597 the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Riley, 42 F. App'x 596 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

42 F. App'x 596 (United States v. Riley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related