United States v. Riley
This text of 42 F. App'x 596 (United States v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court’s order forfeiting substitute assets and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Riley, No. CR-98-101 (E.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2002; Feb. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *597 the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 F. App'x 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-riley-ca4-2002.