United States v. Riggs

287 F.3d 221
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Riggs. Read the opinion of the Court — 287 F.3d 221
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided May 22, 2002·No. 00-2460·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 00-2460

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

JAMES R. RIGGS, JR.,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on April 24, 2002, is amended as follows:

The final paragraph of the opinion should be replaced with the following text:

As a result of the government's breach of the plea agreement, exacerbated by defense counsel's performance, we vacate the sentence and remand the case for further proceedings. Whether specific performance or an opportunity to withdraw the guilty plea is the appropriate remedy is a matter to be considered in the district court. If specific performance is ordered, we refer the court to our admonition in previous cases that in these circumstances resentencing ordinarily ought to be done by a different district judge. See, e.g., United States v. Kurkculer, 918 F.2d 295, 298 (1st Cir. 1990) (citing Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 263 (1971)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Riggs, 287 F.3d 221 (1st Cir. 2002).

287 F.3d 221 (United States v. Riggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santobello v. New York
404 U.S. 257 (Supreme Court, 1971)