United States v. Riggins
74 M.J. 322, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 290
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedMarch 19, 2015
DocketNo. 15-0334/MC
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 74 M.J. 322 (United States v. Riggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Riggins, 74 M.J. 322, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 290 (Ark. 2015).
Opinion
CCA 201400046. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN DECIDING A QUESTION OF LAW WHICH HAS NOT BEEN, BUT SHOULD BE, SETTLED BY THIS COURT WHEN IT HELD THAT ASSAULT CONSUMMATED [323]*323BY BATTERY WAS A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE TO ABUSIVE SEXUAL CONTACT AND SEXUAL ASSAULT.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Riggins
75 M.J. 78 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
74 M.J. 322, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-riggins-armfor-2015.