United States v. Riga

171 F. 783, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5651
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
DecidedJune 11, 1909
DocketNo. 537 (2,040)
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 171 F. 783 (United States v. Riga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Riga, 171 F. 783, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5651 (circtdma 1909).

Opinion

LOWELL, Circuit Judge.

The ‘decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed, for the reasons stated by the Board in its opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Acme Shear Co. v. United States
524 F.2d 1212 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1975)
Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
68 Cust. Ct. 7 (U.S. Customs Court, 1972)
J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States
62 Cust. Ct. 615 (U.S. Customs Court, 1969)
Reynolds Corp. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 11 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)
Herman D. Steel Co. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 141 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)
Glolite Corp. v. United States
24 Cust. Ct. 260 (U.S. Customs Court, 1950)
Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. v. United States
20 Cust. Ct. 78 (U.S. Customs Court, 1948)
All America Cables & Radio, Inc. v. United States
16 Cust. Ct. 74 (U.S. Customs Court, 1946)
Davis Turner & Co. v. United States
13 Cust. Ct. 190 (U.S. Customs Court, 1944)
Barber v. United States
6 Cust. Ct. 340 (U.S. Customs Court, 1941)
Hoenecke v. United States
6 Cust. Ct. 193 (U.S. Customs Court, 1941)
Waltham Watch Co. v. United States
25 C.C.P.A. 330 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1938)
United States v. Sussex Print Works
17 C.C.P.A. 257 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1929)
United States v. Schenkers, Inc.
17 C.C.P.A. 231 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1929)
Dayton Brass Castings Co. v. Gilligan
267 F. 872 (S.D. Ohio, 1920)
Richard v. United States
4 Ct. Cust. 470 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 F. 783, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-riga-circtdma-1909.