United States v. Riesbeck

76 M.J. 269, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 319
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Riesbeck. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 M.J. 176
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided April 28, 2017·No. No. 17-0208/CG·Published

Opinion

CCA 1374, On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues specified by the Court:

I. WHETHER THE MEMBERS OF APPELLANT’S COURT-MARTIAL PANEL WERE PROPERLY SELECTED.

II. WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DEPRIVED OF A FAIR TRIAL, OR THE APPEARANCE OF A FAIR TRIAL, WHERE A MAJORITY OF THE PANEL MEMBERS WERE FORMER VICTIM ADVOCATES AND THE MILITARY JUDGE DENIED A CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE AGAINST ONE OF THEM.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Riesbeck, 76 M.J. 269, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 319 (Ark. 2017).

76 M.J. 269 (United States v. Riesbeck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.