United States v. Riddle

9 U.S. 311, 3 L. Ed. 110, 5 Cranch 311, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 439
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 18, 1809·Published·Cited by 22 cases

Opinion

Marshall, Ch. J,

delivered the opinion of the court to the following effect:

The court thinks this case too plain to admit of argument, or to require deliberation.. It is not within even the letter of the Jaw, and it is certainly not within its spirit. The law did not intend to punish the intention, but the attempt to defraud the revenue.

*313 But as the construction of the law was liable to some question, the court will, suffer the certificate of probable cause to remain as it is. A doubt as to the-true construction of the law is as reasonable •a cause for seizure as a doubt respecting the fact.

Sentence affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Riddle, 9 U.S. 311, 3 L. Ed. 110, 5 Cranch 311, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 439 (1809).

9 U.S. 311 (United States v. Riddle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rovin v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2024
Villarreal v. City of Laredo
94 F.4th 374 (Fifth Circuit, 2024)
Norton v. Town of Islip
Second Circuit, 2023
Perez, Antonio Ruiz
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Antonio Ruiz Perez v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Heien v. North Carolina
135 S. Ct. 530 (Supreme Court, 2014)
Matter of Indiana State Bar Ass'n
550 N.E.2d 311 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1990)
N. Ind. Pub. Serv. Co. v. CITIZENS ACT. COAL. OF IND.
548 N.E.2d 153 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Staples
85 A. 1063 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1913)
United States v. One Trunk
171 F. 772 (S.D. New York, 1909)
Commonwealth v. Peaslee
59 N.E. 55 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
Stacey v. Emery
97 U.S. 642 (Supreme Court, 1878)
United States v. One Sorrel Horse
27 F. Cas. 315 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1847)
The Apollon.
22 U.S. 362 (Supreme Court, 1824)