United States v. Riddick

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Riddick

585 F. App'x 180

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 13, 2014

DocketNo. 14-6957

StatusPublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 180 (United States v. Riddick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Riddick, 585 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are hot binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Devronn Demonn Riddick appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Riddick, No. 2:10-cr-00070-RBS-FBS-2 (E.D.Va. May 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [181]*181materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are hot binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Devronn Demonn Riddick appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Riddick, No. 2:10-cr-00070-RBS-FBS-2 (E.D.Va. May 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [181]*181materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 F. App'x 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-riddick-ca4-2014.