United States v. Riddick

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Riddick

585 F. App'x 180

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 13, 2014·No. No. 14-6957·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are hot binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Devronn Demonn Riddick appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Riddick, No. 2:10-cr-00070-RBS-FBS-2 (E.D.Va. May 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [181] materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are hot binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Devronn Demonn Riddick appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Riddick, No. 2:10-cr-00070-RBS-FBS-2 (E.D.Va. May 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [181] materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Riddick, 585 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

585 F. App'x 180 (United States v. Riddick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.