United States v. Rico
This text of 268 F. App'x 663 (United States v. Rico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Sam Joseph Rico appeals from the 48-month sentence imposed upon remand, following his jury-trial conviction for two counts of transportation of illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (B)(ii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Rico contends that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence for intentionally and recklessly creating a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to the aliens he was transporting. We conclude that the district court did not err by applying the enhancement, especially in light of Rico’s conduct after he was pulled over. See United States v. Miguel, 368 F.3d 1150, 1155 (9th Cir.2004); U.S.S.G. § 2Ll.l(b)(5) (2005); cf. United States v. Torres-Flores, 502 F.3d 885, 890-91 (9th Cir.2007). Accordingly, the sentence is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 F. App'x 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rico-ca9-2008.