United States v. Ricky Riddle
This text of United States v. Ricky Riddle (United States v. Ricky Riddle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 22a0274n.06
No. 21-5416
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED ) Jul 12, 2022 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED v. ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR ) THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF RICKY LEE RIDDLE, ) TENNESSEE Defendant-Appellant. ) )
Before: KETHLEDGE, STRANCH, and NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judges.
KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge. Ricky Lee Riddle was sentenced as a career offender based
in part on a Tennessee robbery conviction. He now challenges that designation. We affirm.
In 2020, Riddle pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The probation office recommended that Riddle be designated a career
offender under the Guidelines because he had two prior convictions for a felony “crime of
violence.” One of those convictions was for robbery in Tennessee, in violation of Tenn. Code
Ann. § 39-13-401. See U.S.S.G. §§ 2K2.1, 4B1.1. That designation would increase Riddle’s base
offense level from 14 to 24. Riddle objected to the report, arguing that Tennessee robbery does
not qualify as a crime of violence under the Guidelines. The district court overruled Riddle’s
objection, designated him as a career offender, and sentenced him to 100 months’ imprisonment. No. 21-5416, United States v. Riddle
We review the district court’s designation of Riddle as a career offender de novo. See
United States v. Hill, 982 F.3d 441, 443 (6th Cir. 2020). Riddle’s argument here is that his
Tennessee offense was not a crime of violence as defined by U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a). That definition
is identical to the definition of a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act. We
therefore construe the two definitions the same way. United States v. Harris, 853 F.3d 318, 320
(6th Cir. 2017). And we have held that Tennessee robbery is a violent felony under the elements
clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act. See United States v. Mitchell, 743 F.3d 1054, 1059 (6th
Cir. 2014); United States v. Randy Belcher, No. 21-5414, slip op. at 3 (6th Cir. July 12, 2022). We
therefore apply that same holding here. The district court was therefore correct to designate Riddle
a career offender.
The district court’s judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Ricky Riddle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ricky-riddle-ca6-2022.