United States v. Ricky Lamb

62 F. App'x 747
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 9, 2003
Docket02-3202
StatusUnpublished

This text of 62 F. App'x 747 (United States v. Ricky Lamb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ricky Lamb, 62 F. App'x 747 (8th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Ricky Ellis Lamb challenges the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to failing to appear for service of sentence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146(a)(2). The district court sentenced him to 21 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release. On appeal, Lamb’s counsel has moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), raising two issues: the district court erroneously denied Lamb (1) credit for time served on, previous federal convictions, and (2) a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.11.

*748 We conclude that the district court did not err in denying Lamb’s request for credit to account for time that he served on previous federal sentences which he claims should have been run concurrently to then undischarged state sentences. We also conclude that the district court made a discretionary decision not to depart, which is unreviewable. See United States v. Edwards, 225 F.3d 991, 992 (8th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1100, 121 S.Ct. 834, 148 L.Ed.2d 715 (2001).

Following careful review of the record, we find no other nonfrivolous issues. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States of America v. Calvin Cornelius Edwards
225 F.3d 991 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)
Plascencia-Garcia v. United States
531 U.S. 1100 (Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 F. App'x 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ricky-lamb-ca8-2003.