United States v. Ricky Douglas Haynes, Jr.
This text of 297 F. App'x 856 (United States v. Ricky Douglas Haynes, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Randee J. Golder, appointed counsel for Ricky Douglas Haynes, Jr., in this direct criminal appeal, has renewed her motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Haynes has filed a *857 motion to discharge counsel and to appoint new counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Haynes’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED, and Haynes’s motion is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
297 F. App'x 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ricky-douglas-haynes-jr-ca11-2008.