United States v. Rickmon

Seventh Circuit

United States v. Rickmon

478 F. App'x 331

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rickmon. Read the opinion of the Court — 436 F. App'x 708 →

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided September 11, 2012·No. No. 10-3474·Published

Opinion

ORDER

After remand by the Supreme Court for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dorsey v. United States, 567 U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2321, 183 L.Ed.2d 250 (2012), and considering the parties’ joint Circuit Rule 54 Statement, we hereby VACATE defendant Ter-rill Rickmon’s sentence and REMAND this case to the district court for re-sentencing under the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 consistent with Dorsey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

After remand by the Supreme Court for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dorsey v. United States, 567 U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2321, 183 L.Ed.2d 250 (2012), and considering the parties’ joint Circuit Rule 54 Statement, we hereby VACATE defendant Ter-rill Rickmon’s sentence and REMAND this case to the district court for re-sentencing under the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 consistent with Dorsey.

United States v. Rickmon, 478 F. App'x 331 (7th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

478 F. App'x 331 (United States v. Rickmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related