United States v. Rick Allen Apker

419 F.2d 388
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 10, 1969
Docket23692
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 419 F.2d 388 (United States v. Rick Allen Apker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rick Allen Apker, 419 F.2d 388 (9th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Apker, an inmate of a Federal Correctional Institution was charged, tried by jury, convicted of Attempted Escape under 18 U.S.C. § 751 and sentenced therefor to 45 days imprisonment, to run consecutively to any other sentences previously imposed.

The evidence before the jury was more than sufficient to support its verdict that Apker was unequivocally activating what may have well been a foolhardy attempt to escape, when he was caught. This court cannot fault that verdict.

That Apker, after being caught, may, thereupon and therefor have been placed in segregated confinement by the institutional officials for 37 days and subsequently convicted and sentenced to confinement by a Federal court for the same acts does not constitute “double jeopardy” under the Fifth Amendment. United States v. Shapiro, 383 F.2d 680, 683 (7th Cir.1967); Rush v. United States, 290 F.2d 709, 710 (5th Cir.1961); Mullican v. United States, 252 F.2d 398, 400, 70 A.L.R.2d 1217 (5th Cir.1958); Patterson v. United States, 183 F.2d 327, 328 (4th Cir.1950); Pagliaro v. Cox, 143 F.2d 900, 901 (8th Cir.1944).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russo v. NJ Dept. of Corrections
737 A.2d 183 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1999)
Worthen v. State
1998 OK CR 37 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1998)
State v. Beeson
569 N.W.2d 107 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1997)
American Samoa Government v. Lafoga
30 Am. Samoa 2d 110 (High Court of American Samoa, 1996)
United States v. Reggie Neon Brown
59 F.3d 102 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Daniel J. Garrity v. Patrick Fiedler
41 F.3d 1150 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
Larry Odoms v. Robert Borg
9 F.3d 1552 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Lance Nevell
9 F.3d 1555 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Alexander v. Maass
5 F.3d 534 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Mott v. State
846 S.W.2d 398 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
United States v. Monte Berrett
978 F.2d 716 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
State v. Fonder
469 N.W.2d 922 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1991)
State v. Killebrew
340 N.W.2d 470 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Killebrew
327 N.W.2d 155 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1982)
In Re Davis
599 P.2d 690 (California Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Procter
367 N.E.2d 908 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1977)
Sadler v. State
333 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Boyd
326 N.E.2d 320 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1975)
Shuman v. Sheriff of Carson City
523 P.2d 841 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 F.2d 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rick-allen-apker-ca9-1969.